<>
Return to Website

Welcome!

Please join us on our new website @:

Welcome To Rapture In The Air
This Forum is Locked
Author
Comment
War or Peace, decision time is NOW . .

The peace treaty has to be signed, what else is ready in the world to begin the last days' war

. . America is losing her power status. The world's elitists are vying together to take over . .. how much longer do the nations shout, peace and safety, til the real deal peace signing happens.

2010 is it, we're outta here church .. .

~ ~


Mercer (6 March 2010)
"The Middle East's hair trigger"




The Middle East's hair trigger - Shlomo ben-ami - www.mmegi.bw

TEL AVIV - Across the Middle East, a fatalistic conventional wisdom is taking hold: war is unavoidable. Some see war as a way of resolving an increasingly deadlocked situation, shaking up a dysfunctional regional order whose main actors are not only at loggerheads, but are also incapable of resolving the legitimacy deficits of their respective regimes.

A volley of incendiary remarks between Israel and both Syria and Hezbollah has fuelled anxieties about the possibility of war on Israel's northern border. The level of sensitivity is such that the latest tension was initiated by the Syrians, who misinterpreted as a threat Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak's call to start peace negotiations precisely in order to prevent "an all-out regional war."

Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, for the first time explicitly warned the Israelis that a new round of conflict would no longer be confined to an Israeli-Lebanese showdown, but would involve the entire regional "axis of confrontation" - Syria, Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas. This would also be the case if Israel unleashed its Air Force against Iran's nuclear installations. Moreover, Nasrallah made it clear that Israel's "Dahyia Doctrine" of total devastation of Lebanon in case of war would be answered in kind.

The prospect of a Middle East conflagration has prompted an airlift of senior American officials to Israel to warn of the devastating consequences that an Israeli attack on Iran might have. Indeed, the Obama administration's main challenge these days is not peacemaking, but regional conflict management and preemption. CIA Director Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen have already come and gone, with Vice President Joe Biden and a high-level delegation of the State Department and the National Security Council due in Jerusalem in early March. But preventing war will not be easy, because Barack Obama's mystique has worn off in the Arab world. The expectation that he would allow the Arabs, particularly the Syrians and the Palestinians, to recover their land without resorting to arms has been proved, by his own admission, to be unrealistic. Nor has he been able to rein in Iran's relentless drive for regional hegemony, or convince it to abandon its quest for nuclear arms.

Israel will most likely listen to America's advice and consider a preemptive attack on Iran only after all diplomatic means have been exhausted, and after whatever sanctions are agreed upon fail to cut short Iran's march toward possessing the bomb. No matter how unjustified Israel's traditional military behavior seems in the eyes of its enemies and critics, it has always aspired to base its military actions on grounds that can be justified.

This would seem to be particularly true when it comes to an attack on Iran's nuclear installations. Israel would not like to be seen as the spoiler of a diplomatic solution to a dispute that in any case cannot be resolved by military means alone. Wars in the Middle East, it should be recalled, have started even when the parties did not really want them. The 1967 war is one example. Today's anxieties, too, are fed by perceptions and fears, by real and imagined concerns.

The Iranian challenge to Israel's strategic hegemony is presented as a Holocaust-style existential threat, and Israel's other enemies - Hezbollah, which believes that it can bring about "the end of the Zionist entity," and Syria, which publicly boasts of its ballistic missiles' capacity to destroy Israel's main urban centers - are similarly viewed as irrational actors.

A covert war between Israel and Iran has been going on for some time now. The assassinations - allegedly by Israel - of Imad Mughniyah, Hezbollah's military chief and Iran's closest ally in the organization, two years ago, and more recently of Mahmoud al-Mahbouh, Hamas's liaison officer with the Al-Quds force of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, suggest that an unplanned chain of events could trigger a real war.

The Lebanese front may ignite if Hezbollah seeks to avenge Mughniyah's death, or simply as a result of a knee-jerk reaction to a provocation, as in 2006. If Iran and Syria then decide to back Hezbollah, a direct Israeli-Iranian showdown could follow. What Israel planned as a preemptive attack on Iran might then be presented as an act of self-defense.

General James Jones, President Obama's national security adviser, recently put forward a different, albeit equally ominous, prediction. Iran's response to the mounting international pressure might be, he said, to launch an attack on Israel through its proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas. Such attacks might trigger a wider regional conflagration. War threats in the Middle East should never be dismissed as hollow. Prophecies of war, moreover, have too frequently proven themselves to be self-fulfilling.

But America's extraordinary efforts to rein in Israel might not be enough to avert a calamity. The days of Pax Americana in the region are over, which means that avoiding a regional explosion will require mobilizing the major international actors that favor diplomatic solutions for the Arab-Israeli conflict and for Iran's quest to become a legitimate partner in a new regional system.

Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

Obama's abominations surely have reached the Heavenly Throne!!!

~ ~


William Zambrano (6 March 2010)
"Showdown over abortion on Easter."



Messiah Complex? Obama Wants His Bill to be Resurrected on Easter
March 4, 2010
Rush Limbaugh

RUSH LIMBAUGH: So what do we have here? We have Obamacare.

And the real sticking point in the House of Representatives -- there is one that triumphs over all -- is abortion.

Obama says he wants the bill on his desk by when? Easter.

Therefore, the way to characterize this, President Obama and the Democrats in a showdown over abortion on Easter. Showdown over abortion on Easter.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: So he wants Obamacare passed on Easter.

Do you realize this guy ruined our summer,
this guy ruined our Thanksgiving,
this guy ruined our Christmas,

and now he's going to ruin our Easter by trying to ramrod something nobody wants down their throats -- and on Easter!

There's something very symbolic about that. I'm going to get to that.

Obamacare was born on Christmas Eve, and now they want to resurrect it on Easter.

Some might say that the bill was conceived on Christmas Eve but the template will fit a messiah if it passes.

How better to portray yourself as a real messiah if your signature issue is born (or conceived, whatever) on Christmas Eve, and dies and then is resurrect on Easter.

There is some irony that Obama's great, great, great plan that is going to ostensibly improve the country's health, all hinges on whether the federal government will pay for the killing of babies or not -- and deciding that by Easter.

Re: Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

HOW SINISTER IS THIS????

(I just realized the root word of this)

Rush Limbaugh sure makes a good point.

Re: Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

There is so much symbolism behind his every move. Only the willfully blind don't see it.

Re: Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

I remember Hal Lindsey saying waaaay back that this nation had to become a 2nd or 3rd world power status IN ORDER for the NWO to begin. Hal had no idea how this would happen . . he does now . . .

B.O. seems to enjoy this temporal thrust of 'power' to disarm this Country, . . his kinda 'glory' is short . . .



staying watchful with eyes to 'see' . .

Re: Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

Donna it's so true.

I always wondered how it would happen too. Now to see it happen before our very eyes as fast as it is, is very scary. Even though God said it would happen, it's still shocking to see it happening so fast.

The world was a very different place just 1.5 years ago. It's breathtaking.

I find myself comforting myself with the realization that indeed this is no surprise to Yeshua. In Him we have Peace when there is no peace!

Re: Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

I can't think how Yeshua can show us any more signs of His soon return.

I TOTALLY agree just 2 years ago, the world was not reeling like today (even the axis have shifted) . . this year declares end-times prophesies in full speed.

Truly our peace comes from KNOWING our GOD still on HIS THRONE. In these perilous times, He's promised His Refuge and Shelter over His own!!!

Re: Oh, church, this has got to be the year . .

Please come quickly, Lord Jesus.

<>
Free Java Chat from Bravenet.com Free Java Chat from Bravenet.com